Pagini recente » Istoria paginii runda/tot-oni-2012-ziua1-11-12 | Utilizatori inregistrati la ACM-ICPC Faza Nationala 2014-2015 | Atasamentele paginii Poze preONI 2007 - gratar | Diferente pentru blog/retrospectiva-anului-2020 intre reviziile 2 si 1 | Diferente pentru blog/meet-in-the-middle intre reviziile 107 si 108
Nu exista diferente intre titluri.
Diferente intre continut:
!<blog/meet-in-the-middle?2des.png 70%!
DES is an encryption standard which uses 56 bit keys. Today computers can use a brute force approach to break the encryption. One simple approach to make the encryption more secure is to apply it twice, using two different keys. This approach is susceptible to the meet in the middle attack developed by Diffie-Hellman. 3DES is less susceptible as it encrypts the message 3 times using 2 keys.
Let’s see why 2DES is vulnerable. Let $Ek$ be the encryption function using the secret key $k$ and $Dk$ the decryption function using the secret key $k$. 2DES uses two keys, k and K. Ek(EK( p)) = s does the encryption and DK(Dk( s)) = p does the decryption.
Let’s see why 2DES is vulnerable. Let $Ek$ be the encryption function using the secret key $k$ and $Dk$ the decryption function using the secret key $k$. 2DES uses two keys, k and K. Ek(EK(p)) = s does the encryption and DK(Dk(s)) = p does the decryption.
Diffie-Hellman’s meet in the middle attack trades off space for time to find out the two secret keys.
For the pattern p it tries all the possible keys to obtain a set of numbers corresponding Ek(p). Also for the pattern s it uses all the possible keys to decrypt s, Dk(s).
Nu exista diferente intre securitate.
Topicul de forum nu a fost schimbat.